Inspired by trail running shoes, these Scarpa hiking boots combine reliable grip, high-quality materials and a lightweight design
Scarpa specialises in producing technically advanced mountaineering boots, but their foray into the lightweight hiking boot market has also attracted widespread attention. The Rush 2 Pro Mid is the latest iteration of the Rush series, featuring a suede upper (replacing the synthetic material of the previous generation) and an upgraded TPU midsole, which provides greater support without adding weight to the boot. We tested an early version of this boot on a backpacking trip in Iceland and a hiking expedition in British Columbia, and have put the latest model through its paces on both day hikes and multi-day treks in the Dolomites. Overall, the boot offers all-weather comfort and flexibility, allowing for a brisk pace, whilst delivering excellent grip on most surfaces. Despite the upgrades, we still feel it may lack some of the stability required for carrying a load across complex terrain, but for light backpackers and fast-paced day hikers, the Rush 2 Pro is highly appealing. Below, we’ll detail our experience with the Rush 2 Mid GTX. To see how it compares to similar products, check out our article on the best hiking boots.
Comfort
As one would expect from a running shoe-inspired design, the Scarpa Rush 2 Pro Mid GTX is an extremely comfortable and well-cushioned hiking boot, just as impressive as its predecessor. The EVA midsole provides comfortable cushioning underfoot, and the arch is well supported. The boots felt comfortable straight out of the box, with no discomfort or pain whatsoever, and I wasn’t in a hurry to take them off even after a full day’s wear. I really like the integrated collar and tongue design; they fit the foot like a sock and effectively prevent loose stones from getting in. The boots offer excellent protection for the soles of the feet; I felt no discomfort from sharp rocks, and the rubber toe cap withstood several impacts to the toes. The boot’s silhouette is similar to that of a running shoe, with slightly less room in the forefoot, but this design, combined with the lightweight construction, makes the boots very agile and comfortable, ideal for use on challenging terrain and during fast-paced hikes.
We previously had some comfort issues with the lacing system on the previous generation of the Rush Mid, particularly when tightening the laces around the ankle. However, I haven’t experienced any discomfort with the latest Pro version. The lacing system doesn’t appear to have changed much between the two generations, but the new suede upper may offer better cushioning than the synthetic upper of the previous model. The collar is flexible and comfortable, even during long downhill runs. That said, my foot shape differs from my husband’s (who tested the previous generation), so it’s best to try them on before buying, particularly if you have a high instep.
Weight
My pair of size 40 Scarpa Rush 2 Pro Mid GTX shoes weigh 1 lb 12 oz (the women’s version weighs 1 lb 10.1 oz, and the men’s version weighs 2 lb 0.1 oz), which is comparable to many other trail running shoes. By way of comparison, Salomon’s X Ultra 5 Mid GTX also weighs 1 lb 12 oz, Hoka’s Anacapa 2 Mid GTX (which prioritises cushioning) weighs 1 lb 13.4 oz, and La Sportiva’s Nucleo High II GTX weighs 1 lb 10.9 oz. It is worth noting that even during long trail runs, I never felt the weight of the Rush. Although there are some compromises in terms of stability and protection (which I will discuss in detail below), I really appreciated the boot’s agility on the terrain of the Dolomites, where the terrain ranges from steep and rocky to muddy and flat.
A woman wearing hiking boots walks across a thick log.
Rush 2 Pro Mid: Lightweight and agile | Image credit: Brian McCurdy
Traction
As climbing is at the heart of Scarpa’s business, it comes as no surprise that the Rush 2 Pro Mid GTX offers excellent grip, particularly on rocky terrain. Even when climbing ladders, steel cables and bolted steps that are slippery with dew after rain, the Rush 2 Pro’s Presa/SuperGym outsole grips with ease. Back home on Vancouver Island, these boots handled hard clay, sandy ground, muddy terrain and smooth rock with ease. They proved reliable even in snow. I can’t recall a single slip, nor did I encounter any issues with dirt or stones getting lodged in the lugs (the previous generation suffered from mud build-up, so we’re pleased the latest model has resolved this).
The tread pattern on the sole of the hiking boots
The sole offers exceptional grip, providing reliable traction across all terrains | Image credit: Sasha Brown
Stability and Support
Reducing weight almost always comes at the expense of stability and support, and the Scarpa Rush 2 Mid GTX is no exception. On the plus side, the shoe features thick padding that effectively absorbs impact, whilst the TPU frame enhances heel rigidity, ensuring a secure and stable fit. Furthermore, the shoe incorporates a hard plastic heel counter, which further improves stability in the rearfoot and helps prevent twisting. However, I found the collar to be slightly lacking in stability, particularly when using just a single lace hole. The collar seems to serve more as a barrier against debris entering the shoe than as a stabilising feature.
A woman hiking on the beach in her hiking boots
Although the Rush 2 Pro’s collar isn’t the stiffest, it offers sufficient support for light hiking | Image credit: Brian McCurdy
With that in mind, I wouldn’t recommend these as the first choice for backpackers planning a long-distance trek with a heavy load. To be fair, my husband did test the previous generation on a multi-day backpacking trip along Iceland’s Laugavegur Trail, where he was carrying a 50-pound rucksack over relatively gentle terrain. If the terrain were more rugged, these shoes might not provide sufficient support. Those prone to twisting their ankles might also require a boot with a stiffer sole for backpacking (it’s worth noting that Scarpa has launched the Rush TRK series, which features a higher collar and offers better support). Ultimately, however, it comes down to personal preference. Setting backpacking aside, I believe the Rush 2 Pro performs excellently as a light-packing or day-hiking boot, where the demands on load-bearing support are not particularly high.
Waterproofing and Breathability
Gore-Tex is the gold standard in waterproof and breathable membranes, and the Rush 2 Pro Mid GTX performs exceptionally well in wet conditions. During my trip to the Dolomites, there was plenty of rain, with occasional drizzle, and I had to wade across streams on several hikes, but the Rush 2 Pro Mid GTX did an excellent job of keeping my feet dry. It is worth noting that the collar reaches roughly to the heel, so care must be taken not to wade too deeply. My Rush 2 Pro Mid GTX became completely soaked in the stream and took a long time to dry (the combination of a waterproof membrane and a leather upper naturally means they do not dry quickly). However, even when wet, they remained comfortable to wear whilst hiking. The Rush 2 Pro Mid GTX also performed quite well in summer temperatures reaching over 70 degrees Fahrenheit, though non-waterproof models offer better breathability in sweltering heat.
A woman hiking in the snow wearing hiking boots
Toe and Ankle Protection
Aside from support, lightweight hiking boots often offer less protection than heavier hiking boots. The Rush 2 Mid is no exception: whilst it represents a significant improvement over mid-cut trail running shoes, its protection is not on a par with sturdier hiking boots. The rubber toe cap and collar do a good job of protecting my feet from sharp rocks, and the leather upper offers more protection than the synthetic material of the previous generation, but you still need to watch your step. Overall, however, I think Scarpa has struck a good balance between weight and protection. As I mentioned earlier, the outsole and midsole provide ample cushioning underfoot, so I have absolutely no concerns about stepping on sharp rocks. Unless you’re heading into high-altitude terrain or expect to encounter a lot of rugged terrain, the Rush 2 Pro Mid should be more than capable of handling your hiking needs.
A close-up shot of a pair of hiking boots placed on a log
Fit and sizing A woman wearing hiking boots sitting on the grass Other versions of the Scarpa Rush 2 Scarpa Rush Mid 2 GTX Hiking Boots (Light Snow Hiking)
For decades, Scarpa has been dedicated to producing high-quality footwear, and the Rush 2 Mid GTX is yet another superbly crafted, durable design from this Italian brand. After a considerable period of use and wear, my pair of boots shows almost no signs of wear: the rubber toe cap and synthetic upper show no signs of scuffing or delamination, the outsole is intact with no visible cracks, all laces and eyelets are in perfect condition, and the thick midsole still provides a comfortable feel underfoot. There are some minor scratches and scuffs on the outer side of the midsole, but these are merely cosmetic flaws and are to be expected with frequent use. The suede upper offers significantly improved durability compared to the synthetic upper of the previous generation, and after testing, it has only sustained a few minor scuffs. All in all, the Rush 2 Mid GTX’s lightweight construction makes it exceptionally robust and durable.
I usually wear a US women’s size 8.5, which is equivalent to a European size between 40 and 40.5. I chose size 40 and found that the Rush fits perfectly. My husband bought a pair of Rush shoes previously; his usual size was too tight, so he eventually had to go up a size, but this pair fits me just right. The toe box felt a little narrow at first, but after wearing them for a while, the shoes stretched out and eventually moulded to the shape of my feet (which is one of the advantages of suede). It only took a few short walks to break them in. I was also pleased to find that the laces are very secure and do not come undone whilst walking, which is not always the case with hiking boots.
I’m wearing the women’s Rush 2 Mid GTX, but Scarpa also produces an almost identical men’s version at the same price. The men’s version is slightly heavier and comes in different colours, but the functionality and overall construction are the same. For those who don’t need or want ankle support, Scarpa also sells a waterproof low-cut version of the Rush 2, available in both men’s and women’s styles (there is no non-waterproof version). Additionally, those requiring more support might prefer the Rush TRK, which features a higher collar and two extra eyelets for increased stability. Finally, the Rush Trail GTX is a lighter, more streamlined version of the low-cut Rush.
These shoes are well-padded, mould to the shape of your feet, and are comfortable and flexible, allowing you to walk naturally without feeling any discomfort, even when worn all day long.
This racket weighs less than 2 pounds, making it incredibly lightweight, and it feels very nimble in the hand.
The Gore-Tex membrane provides reliable waterproofing without compromising breathability.
The outsole offers excellent grip on most terrains, from softer surfaces such as snow and riverbeds to hard trails and rocky slopes.
This product is well-made, durable and lightweight – ours has shown almost no wear and tear even after considerable use.
The latest version features improved rearfoot support, enhancing torsional stability.
The sizing is spot on; I wear this size as usual, and the leather upper moulds to the shape of the foot over time.
What we didn’t like
This isn’t the most protective or stable option – if you’re carrying a full pack across challenging terrain, you might need a sturdier, more durable hiking boot.
The suede upper takes longer to dry than the synthetic upper on the previous generation.
A woman sitting on a log, wearing hiking boots
The Rush 2 Pro is a lightweight, durable hiking boot, beautifully crafted | Image credit: Brian McCurdy
Competition
The Rush 2 Mid strikes a good balance between hiking performance and weight, but there are many lightweight, high-performance hiking boots available on the market. If you require greater support, consider La Sportiva’s TX Hike Mid Leather GTX, which features a higher collar (particularly at the heel) and a more secure lacing system. Although it does not offer the same level of support as some bulkier hiking boots, it performs exceptionally well on backpacking trips over challenging terrain. However, the TX Hike lacks the flexibility of the Rush 2 and feels more substantial. For light, fast-paced hikes, we still recommend the Rush 2 Mid, as it boasts a more responsive midsole and is lighter in weight.
A woman walking across a log in her hiking boots
The Rush 2 Pro Mid combines lightness, durability and comfort | Image credit: Brian McCurdy
La Sportiva’s Nucleo High II GTX is another contender worth considering, featuring a higher collar and a double-lacing system. Furthermore, it boasts a more aggressive outsole pattern, with premium rubber reinforcements on the toe and the outer side of the upper. Although the Nucleo appears robust on paper, it retains its flexibility and lightness. Moreover, this snow boot is remarkably lightweight, weighing on average just a few ounces more than the Rush. For those seeking greater ankle support without compromising on weight or flexibility, the Nucleo is a solid alternative to the Rush. The Nucleo’s main drawbacks are its price and its slightly technical appearance. Salomon
’s X Ultra 5 Mid is another popular model in this category, and in some respects it outperforms the Rush. Salomon’s lacing system is one of the best designs we’ve tested; this snowshoe allows for easy adjustment of tightness, providing extra ankle support. It doesn’t possess the same trail-running-style bounce and flexibility as the Rush, but it offers better forefoot wrap and greater stability on off-road terrain. Despite the reinforced toe box and generous use of rubber on the sides, it remains lightweight, and Salomon’s outsole performs exceptionally well across all terrains. However, for more technical tasks—such as climbing or fast-paced hiking—we would still opt for the Rush, as it offers more precise control and superior grip
